I remember the oat porridge my mother used to cook. It was not instant oats. She added sugar to the oats and i like how it was lightly charred at the base when cooked, soft and creamy. Then she poured over it hot milk that was made from creamy milk powder in hot water. It was divine. Milk tastes different when it is made with dehydrated whole milk powder. As a child and also in my teens, I had liked putting tiny scoop of milk powder into my mouth. It tasted deliciously sweet.
There are things you recall about your childhood but you cannot truly verify the accuracy of it. To a large extent, we are what we remember about the stuff we have experienced over the years, and every experience we have can only be retold from our memories. There are things we choose to remember and there are others we would rather forget. We tend to romanticize the good memories and try to forget the bad ones in order to move on.
My mother passed away more than thirty-seven years ago.
How often do we tell our own life story? How often do we adjust, embellish, make sly cuts? And the longer life goes on, the fewer are those around to challenge our account, to remind us that our life is not our life, merely the story we have told about our life. Told to others, but – mainly – to ourselves.
- The Sense of Ending, Julian Barnes p.95 (Jonathan Cape Random House, 2011)
Julian Barnes writes about love and memory. After I read the author's The Sense of an Ending, I read several of his other books, both fictions and non-fictions. I recently read his latest novel, DEPARTURE(S) and he tells us this will be his last book. He is certainly a prolific writer and his writings demonstrate a dry sense of humour.


In DEPARTURE(S) Julian Barnes tells the story of how he helped to bring together his two university friends, Stephen and Jean, not once but twice and then their rekindled relationship ended. He was at the City of London from 1957-1964 and then studied at Magdalen, Oxford between 1964 and 1968. Back then at the university, only ' sixteen per cent were women: so, one woman to 6.25 men that was the ratio.' When his friends split the first time after graduating from Oxford , he also loses touch with them. Decades later, Stephen who was now divorced, wrote him a letter and when they met, Stephen asked him to arrange a catch up with Jean because he was still in love with her. He had reached the age 'where most of his friends from a generation, or even half a generation, ahead of him were dying off' so he was happy to have Stephen and Jean back in his life. When they reconnected with one another, they saw 'a fair amount of one another, but somehow without regaining the same intimacy and camaraderie of the earlier years' They visited him separately to tell him things. He made a rule not to pass on what one of them had said to the other. 'Not even a hint, not even if it would have been tactically useful.'

Barnes narrates that 'Stephen was so determined to get it right this time-having spent decades berating himself and lamenting his earlier insistence that they could settle their joint lives forevever at the age of twenty-one- that he got it wrong again, but differently. It was as if he no longer considered, let alone valued, the forty years of life he'd passed between Jean Part One and Jean Part Two;as if nothing of importance had happened in that time. '
Barnes decides to research on the matter and finds that the classic problem in such emotional revisiting is that the parties unconsciously reproduce the same behaviour that had led the initial relationship to founder. The manipulative continued to manipulate, and the over-possessive to over-possess, but without acknowledging it. The intervening years have not brought them greater maturity at all. So here is how he sums up about Jean and Stephen.
' His tragedy is that he can love, but that his love cannot be accepted.'
'Her tragedy is that she cannot love, but that what she does offer is accepted as love.'
'What Stephen viewed as a rounded, dramatic, necessary conclusion to thier two lives Jean saw as - what?-no more than a somewhat intriguing possibility.'
Stephen clearly did not or failed to acknowledge that Jean had remained single all her life until they met again and to Jean, 'non-attachment had seemed like a kind of freedom, not necessarily sought but easily borne; she wasn't sure she needed or wanted anyone seioius in her life at this pre-terminal stage.'
Barnes concludes that what he has written are 'more a novelist's assumptions than an accurate digest 'of all that they told him.; and 'are inevitably coloured' by his' own experiences and preconceptions of life'.
Stephen appears to be still a dreamer in his sixties. It is apparent that he is in love with the concept of romantic love and possibly the idea of Jean as the one that has gotten away. That happens to the best of us if and when we allow ourselves to get carried away.
When Jean died, Barnes now seventy-six, inherited her sixteen year-old dog, a Jack Russell named Jimmy. 'half- deaf and half blind and almost comically toothless.'
Barnes muses that Jimmy does not rage about much- 'he is a stoic who sleeps a great deal.Though he does resent some things, like not being allowed to stop every fifteen yards on a walk, or being given a constant diet of dog food, much preferring human left overs.' Barnes and his friends Stephen and Jean had a conversation about time, or mortality and how Jimmy does not have any idea about metaphysical questions. So Stephen and Barnes concluded that Jimmy does not even know that he is a dog.

At home we are constantly amused by our Holly, a mongrel that had come to stay since the day she walked into our garden looking famished in February 2016. Living is seemingly very simple to a dog.
In DEPARTURE(S) Julian Barnes also tells his own story about the journey he has taken to come to terms with blood cancer, which walks alongside him, kept in check by chemotherapy and medication. He also talks about his first wife, Pat who was six years his senior and died in 2008. She was diagnosed with a malignant brain tumour and died thirty-seven days later.

He writes, "raged against the dying of her light, but I didn't imagine that some cunningly concealed fairness or justice came into the matter. Insofar as I could be calmed by any mere phrase, it was one that suddenly came to me back then, and which I continue to employ: 'It's just the universe doing its stuff.' "
'Departure habitually leads to arrival. Not always, of course as with those poetic French dreamsers who never let port. But at train stations, bus depots and airports we gaze at departure and arrival boards. We go, we arrive, we set off in return, and reach home again: we live with this momentum. But these trajectories lie within a larger and more contrary version. In our lives, arrival comes first, and departure comes atthe end - except a departure without subsequent arrival.'
Barnes writes about aging and how he is aware that after forty-four years of being published, he must be repeating himself with the same old tropes and memes, and even repeating his jokes. He makes reference to Involuntary Autobiographical Memory (IAM) and IAM is a memory that could be triggered by a touch, smell, taste or sight and somehow reveals itself unlike a 'voluntary memory'. Julian Barnes' novels make very pleasurable read and his


















.jpeg)








